Has anyone managed to sucessfully upload a file from Vistumbler? I've tried to upload the .txt export but Wigle doesn't recognise it (0 networks). Any suggestions? Cheers. Types supported: NetStumbler: native (.ns1), text, wiscan, summary DStumbler: text output Kismet: CSV (.csv), XML (.xml), GPS (...

Now it's not...

edit: Nevermind, my stuff was broken.

Uploads working now.

Same here except I tried uploading a .csv and .gps file (same error). Files are good. Upload Results An Error has occurred: File was empty Please go back and try again. Then I tried zipping them. Upload Results An Error has occurred: File was empty Unable to process zipfile (/local/tmp/1138335347_PM...

My G122 works great in OpenBSD... for wireless access (uses the ural driver) The problem you'll encounter with scanning software is that most of it communicates directly to the adapter and does not use the kernel driver. So, just because the OS can see the device, does not mean that your stumbling ...

I believe it's version 1. I'm not exactly sure how to find the version. In device manager it says "WRC54GS V1", so I figured version 1, but in netstumbler it says the same "WPC54GS V1", but out from it is "NDIS 5.1". How do I find what chipset it uses? http://www.wrzwa...

I had a similar thing happen to me on my first wardriving experience. I use netstumbler on XP Pro with a Linksys WPC54GS. I picked up a network and it just got stuck. Showed it was still connected several miles later. The dot didn't turn red, though. Once I made it home, I was still "connected...

What area do you want files from?

What area are you from?

What kind of research (simulations)?

wrzwaldo, your constant use of the argumentum ad hominem in lieu of any substantive, on-topic discussion is ample proof that you're nothing but an empty-headed poseur with nothing to contribute to this forum. Do us all a favor and go back to your bridge, you troll. There's no shame in not knowing s...

At 2.4 GHz yes, [propagation of RF energy] are the same [as propagation of visible light]. They are certainly NOT! Well...I guess it settles that! After all, you shouted "NOT", which is indisputable proof...not. :roll: Just because you can see the target does not mean at 2400MHz you have ...

RF-LOS not visual LOS. At 2.4 GHz yes, they are the same. They are certainly NOT! Just because you can see the target does not mean at 2400MHz you have LOS! Get a clue. FRESNEL ZONE (sometimes freznel) - an area around the path that should be kept clear of all reflective surfaces so that out of pha...

... BTW, this is a line-of-sight deal. If you can't see the other antenna, all the gain in the world isn't going to help you. Also, unless your friends all live within the 8° beamwidth of this antenna, it's strictly point-to-point. However because the reflector isn't symmetrical, that 8° figure is ...

I like the SSID stats. When you get a free moment could you add channel stats also? Not a big rush mind you.

I donate my findings.....I do it for the fun and the prestige of having a laptop running at all times in my car / truck. you guys feel free to do what ever you damn well please with the data I gather, just keep the site up and have fun. remember, if it aint fun, don't do it . Got it! Note to self: ...